Ouija board with planchette and a small vase on a table, dimly lit.

10 Signs a Software Development Project Needs Help

TL;DR: Most software projects don't fail overnight. They drift off course one small issue at a time. Here are 10 common warning signs that a project may be headed in the wrong direction, along with practical advice for reducing risk and getting development back on track.

Séances, Whodunits and Billable Hours 

Timelines slip, budgets balloon, issues pile up. Eventually the project gets cancelled or quietly fails. Then comes the blame game. Whose fault was it? Usually no one's – and everyone's – which is deeply unsatisfying for all involved. 

I've spent 20 years being parachuted into projects that had, shall we say, character. It feels odd to admit that much of my work has been about getting things back on track. I’m rarely called when things are going well. My family has stopped asking me how work is going. 

The upside of a career like mine is that you start seeing patterns. So I'm sharing the situations I've encountered most often – the quiet signals that a project may be heading off course. 

If you recognize any of these, congratulations: you're in excellent and extremely numerous company. These problems are very common – and rarely anyone's fault in particular. 

And, the part I actually enjoy, they're fixable. It's never too late to get a project back on track. 

The Greatest Hits of Project Failure

1. Insufficient Code Tracking  (Git, Who Dis?) 

Version control is fundamental to any software project. Skip it at your peril, and I mean that literally. I've billed a lot of hours to peril. I've met teams who didn't have it, and I still think about them sometimes, usually late at night.

The boring, correct answer is Git: industry standard, huge ecosystem, and every developer you'll ever hire already knows it. You can choose something else, but make sure there's a clear technical reason. History, habit and cost don't count.

2. Excessive Red Tape (Death by a Thousand Boards) 

Software development demands flexibility: hit deadlines, cut the red tape, keep overhead minimal. Processes exist to support developers, not to slow them down. If your team is maintaining bug trackers, feature boards, scrum sprints, specification tickets, the water cooler in the lobby, and, at some point, the front lawn, they aren't tracking the work. They are the work. 

Time spent feeding management software is time not spent building the product. I've fed a lot of management software in my career. It's never once said thank you.

3. Measuring the Wrong Metrics (Metrics Will Continue Until Morale Improves) 

Metrics can be useful, but they rarely tell the whole story. Bugs closed, PRs reviewed, lines of code written – none of it captures collaboration, decision-making or problem-solving. It just stresses out the dev team, who will then optimize for the metric instead of the product. Developers are excellent optimizers. That's the whole problem. 

Use metrics to spot trends and measure what matters, not to judge individuals. I'd rather use no metrics at all than bad ones.

4. Solving a Problem That’s Already Been Solved (Reinventing the Wheel, Now with Fewer Spokes)

If you can solve a problem by buying an existing solution, do it. Build where you're unique, buy where you're not. Engineering effort belongs where it creates competitive advantage. Bluetooth stacks, OTA updates, authentication – these are solved problems with well-supported commercial and open-source options. 

Your custom version will not be better. I know, yours is different. Everyone’s is! That's what makes them all the same. And if you think you don't have the budget for an off-the-shelf solution, you definitely don't have the budget to build one yourself. That last sentence has paid for a significant portion of my mortgage.

5. Poor Communication (Elementary, My Dear Slack Channel)

Clear, frequent communication can prevent small problems from becoming expensive ones. Make the process convenient. Use a chat system like Slack or Teams, and build an environment where collaboration happens naturally. A group channel where anyone can ask anything means answers get found, knowledge gets shared and issues get resolved quickly.

Avoid siloing communication. Reconstructing who knew what, and when, is detective work in the world's dullest mystery. I do enjoy a good whodunit, I just prefer Agatha's.  

6. Outdated Tech Stack (Do Not Restart the Beige One)

Regular technology updates are an investment that reduces risk and keeps projects moving. Technical debt compounds over time. A 15-year-old framework or a compiler that only runs on deprecated hardware makes every aspect of a project more expensive, in the way that ignoring interest payments makes a loan more expensive. Which is to say: quietly, relentlessly and then all at once.

Regular technology updates are an investment. They reduce risk, keep projects moving efficiently, and dramatically lower the number of sticky notes required. 

7. Lack of Ownership (Schrödinger's Source Code aka Whose Code is it Anyway?)

Own your software, not just your IP. Make sure your organization legally and physically owns source code, repositories, build environments, deployment processes and documentation. The legal rights alone aren't enough.

Early in my career, I assumed “we own the IP” and “we have the code” meant the same thing. I have since been thoroughly cured of this belief, at other people's expense. Legally holding the IP means nothing if you can't find or build your code. Once you have the code, refer back to point #1.

8. Piecemeal Documentation (What Was Dave Thinking? Literally, What?)

What happens when the team member holding critical knowledge leaves? The insight goes with them. I am mildly famous for conducting séances, gathering the remaining team to summon what David was thinking in 2016.

You can skip the candles. Document architecture decisions, setup instructions and deployment processes in one centralized system the whole team can access. It reduces onboarding time, improves consistency, and, unlike my séances, it works – though I'll admit it lacks a certain drama. 

9. Inefficient Onboarding (Hurry Up and Wait)  

Speaking of onboarding: if it takes more than a day to onboard a new hire or contractor, that's a problem. New developers should have working hardware, repository access, development tools and essential documentation on day one. 

Not week one. Day one. I once spent my first two weeks at an engagement unable to open repositories or documentation. I know exactly what those days cost, because I invoiced them.

10. Not Fully Leveraging Your Experts (Hired for Insight, Used for Typing) 

Specialists deliver the most value when they're trusted to apply their expertise. Encourage questions, discuss tradeoffs and decide collaboratively but avoid micromanaging every technical detail. Set clear goals and constraints, then give experts the autonomy to determine the path.

Hiring a specialist and then second-guessing every decision is like buying a navigation system and arguing with it at every turn. You can do it. I've watched people do it. Everyone arrives late and nobody enjoys the ride. Teams work best when expertise, accountability and trust travel together.

And because here at ICS we always take it up a notch, I’m adding an #11 to our Top 10 list:  

11. Small, Experienced Teams Get Results (David vs. Goliath) 

Across my 20 years in the business, one lesson keeps repeating: a small team of experienced engineers who understand the problem deeply, communicate well and take ownership will almost always outperform a much larger team that's weighed down by process or inexperience, even when the big team is armed with the latest management and tracking tools. Especially then, honestly.

The larger the team, the heavier the coordination, communication and management overhead. Goliath had size, armor – and presumably an excellent org chart. It didn't help.

Where to Go From Here

If any of these challenges sounded familiar, take heart: you're in good and plentiful company. Fortunately, every one of them is fixable with the right guidance and a willingness to course-correct. Projects rarely fail from one big mistake. Instead, they drift, one small unexamined habit at a time – which means they can drift back.

If your project needs a helping hand, you know who to call when things aren't going as planned. I've spent decades helping organizations get complex software projects back on track so they can reach their full potential. Get in touch.